As Donald Trump maintains and builds on his commanding lead in polling of the Republican presidential nominating contest, the notion of the former president’s “inevitability” gains momentum.
Trump’s nearest rival, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, has yet to announce his intentions but trails by as much as 30 points in the early surveys. Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, despite an active campaign schedule, has failed to gain traction, as has former vice president Mike Pence. Others, like former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson and South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, barely register.
Any candidate wouldn’t get a second look if they were weighed down by the baggage Trump carries – a criminal indictment, the subject of three state or Federal investigations, and on trial in a defamation suit connected to an allegation of rape.
Trump has airily dismissed all the allegations as part of a political witch hunt by a government/media cabal to deny him a return to the presidency.
In the face of all the legal issues, Trump’s grip on Republican voters hasn’t weakened. In fact, support rose following his indictment on business fraud charges by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Trump gave impetus to the inevitability theory by suggesting he would not participate in party-sanctioned debates, since the issue has already been decided in his favor and any face-to-face confrontations would be pointless.
The loyalty of the party base is a testament to his ability to connect at a visceral level with the disaffected, those millions who share Trump’s disdain for the “elites,” the upper class who look down upon working men and women as unthinking, uneducated rubes incapable of understanding the issues the nation faces.
In his 2012 re-election campaign, former President Obama described them as individuals who cling to guns and religion and demonize people unlike them.
In an America as deeply polarized as the country is today, Trump’s message resonates. His supporters delight in his swagger and his pugnacious personality. They see someone whose toughness will deter the nation’s enemies and is unafraid to challenge rather than cringe in the face of opposition.
Many believe his 2020 loss to President Biden resulted from a fraudulent and corrupt election process and are willing to overlook the lack of any contrary evidence. They share his characterization of the media as “an enemy of the people,” believing it guilty of misinformation, biased reporting, a hatred of all things Trump.
The presidential election is 20 months off and polling at this point is not a reliable indicator of the outcome. The start of the primary election season is less than a year away and a great deal can happen in the intervening months to dramatically change the political environment.
For instance, will his supporters reconsider or his support erode if he is charged with criminal conduct for allegedly interfering in the election process, possessing classified material or – worse yet – encouraging a mob of supporters to assault the U. S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to prevent the official certification of Biden’s victory?
His support at this stage appears unshakeable, but not invincible. For party leaders who fear his candidacy will cost Republicans the White House and control of Congress, it is their obligation to coalesce behind a Trump alternative, marshal the organizational and fund raising prowess at their command and convince Trump voters that their concerns are the party’s concerns.
President Biden enters his 2024 re-election campaign as one of the more vulnerable incumbents in recent history. His job performance remains mired at around 40 percent, inflation continues to punish the economy while crime and immigration remain chronic issues. His age, acuity and physical condition are matters of serious concern and a majority of self-identified Democrats prefer a different candidate.
The stars are in alignment for a Republican victory, but someone other than Trump must be the person reaching for them.
–
Copyright 2023 Carl Golden, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.
Carl Golden is a senior contributing analyst with the William J. Hughes Center for Public Policy at Stockton University in New Jersey. You can reach him at cgolden1937@gmail.
